Small Post 2

As I was reading through the articles on Family History I noticed how I did not recognize many of the resources and terms used in the earlier articles. Technology has grown into something that is effective and has successful usability which can be seen through the advancements in Family History. In the early stages, people were being encouraged to gather records, write down information, and talk with relatives. In the article published in 2000, we see that there were multiple sources one could use to find information and it could be recorded, seen, and cross-referenced by anyone. Now, with FamilySearch, all of those multiple sites have been brought together in a simple and intuitive layout that anybody can learn easily. It is not overwhelming and is simple to connect with other people and store or view information. I am amazed by how years of methods and systems were brought together rather seamlessly by one application.

Current Event 2

Comments on this article: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/25/technology/exposing-hidden-biases-at-google-to-improve-diversity.html?_r=0


As I was reading this article reviewing diversity bias within Google I could not help but wonder if lack of gender diversity is in fact a problem. There is no doubt that females contribute to companies by ways of various forms of thinking, views, and abilities. As a woman in Computer Science, I appreciate all the help that companies such as Google are doing to mitigate gender bias; however, I do not necessarily view the low ratio of females to males as something that needs to be "fixed". With the ratio of females to males in technology-related fields in the education system, it is inevitable that the ratio will be similar in the industry. Also, men and woman are different. They think differently, they have different interests, and they have different social roles. I see firsthand how much Computer Science seems better suited to the way men work and do not see this as a bad thing. Tech Giants that hire more men than women are hiring people who, in my opinion, are innately structured better for technology and who are typically more interested in the work.

Current Event 1

Comments on article: http://www.denverpost.com/business/ci_26524127/food-and-drug-administration-rules-disrupt-medical-technology

With technological advances progressing at such a vast rate, the research into medical technology is inevitable explored. I like what the article said about how Silicon Valley bringing their products under FDA scrutiny was "alien" to them. When products are built and released so frequently it makes me wonder what medical technology has been underway and for how long. I think that the regulations on medical technology is absolutely necessary. As much as these advances could benefit those with medical needs, the accuracy and professional expertise is a very important aspect. I know of medical conditions of friends that are anomalies in nature and only certain professionals are familiar with the treatment. Having somebody with an education in the matter and the ability to judge certain situations should be present when dealing with the human body and life itself.

Smallish blog post 1

I was able to understand and connect with the article: Five Things We Need to Know About Technological Change. For a long time, I have always felt like a walking computer science contradiction because I am in this technological field but I do not love all the technological advances and especially our reliance on technology. I do not feel that our society needs an "app for that" and it scares me how everything is becoming digitalized. It seems that heaps of this new technology intended to make our lives easier is only making everything far more complicated and we are losing the simple things in life, like walking outside to get the mail, reading a paper book, or meeting somebody on campus instead of on Tinder. This Neil Postman article hits this concept right on the head. Technology has advantages and disadvantages that will inevitably alter society. We see the world through screens and pixels which has become the norm. The question to consider is whether this norm is indeed an overall benefit to our nature as human beings. That question is one to think about and this article gave substantial evidence to stir our thoughts.